On the occasion of the Republic's 103rd anniversary, Kastamonu University hosted a panel titled "103rd Year of the Republic: Memory, Identity, and Continuity." In the panel titled "Republic in Its 103rd Year: Memory, Identity, and Continuity," the historical process leading to the Republic, the political and social transition from the Ottoman Empire to the Republic, and Anatolia's place in Turkish literature were examined.
The panel held on October 27, 2026, in the Cemil Meriç Hall of our University's Central Library, began with a moment of silence and the reading of the National Anthem. The program was attended by Deputy Governor Hakan Kubalı, Vise Rector Prof. Dr. Ömer Küçük, and academics and students participated.
Prof. Dr. Ercan Çelebi is giving the opening speech of the panel. Prof. Dr. Çelebi stated that they came together to commemorate and celebrate the 103rd anniversary of the Republic and expressed that the panel was shaped around the concepts of memory, identity, and continuity. Stating that memory represents the historical past, identity represents the values gained by the Republic, and continuity represents the bond between the past, present, and future, Prof.Dr. Çelebi touched upon the political and social transformations in Turkish history.
Stating that the historical accumulation from the Göktürks and the Great Seljuk Empire to the modernization movements of the Ottomans is important for understanding the process leading to the Republic, Çelebi noted that the reform movements, the Tanzimat, and the Constitutional Era contributed to the development of a new understanding of state and society.
The process from the Ottoman Empire to the Republic was discussed
The first speaker of the panel was Assist.Prof.Dr. Murat Yılmaz, a faculty member of the Department of Political History in the International Relations Department of the Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences. In his speech titled "The Process Leading to the Republic: From the Ottoman Empire to the Republic," Yılmaz explained that the Republic did not emerge solely from a decision made on October 29, 1923, but was shaped as a result of long-standing modernization movements, political thought debates, and the struggle for national sovereignty.
Evaluating the modernization movements of the Ottoman Empire in the 19th century, Assist.Prof.Dr Yılmaz stated that the innovations that began during the reigns of Selim III and Mahmud II gained a different dimension with the Tanzimat Edict. He stated that the spread of modern educational institutions, sending students to Europe, and training bureaucrats who knew foreign languages contributed to the recognition of Western political thoughts in Ottoman society.
Touching on the role of the press in the spread of new political ideas, Assist. Prof.Dr. Yılmaz said that intellectuals such as Şinasi, Namık Kemal, and Ali Suavi contributed to the discussion of the concepts of homeland, nation, freedom, and public opinion. He stated that the demands for a constitution and a constitutional monarchy, which were strengthened by the Young Ottomans movement, were effective in the declaration of the First Constitutional Era in 1876.
Evaluating the place of the National Struggle period in the process leading to the Republic, Assist. Prof.Dr Yılmaz stated that the developments from Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's landing in Samsun to the Amasya Circular and the Erzurum-Sivas congresses, and from the opening of the Grand National Assembly of Türkiye to the 1921 Constitution of the Organization, strengthened the understanding of national sovereignty. He noted that important stages in the political and institutional transformation of the new state were completed with the abolition of the sultanate, the proclamation of the Republic, and the abolition of the caliphate.
Emphasizing that the Republic is a common historical heritage, Assist.Prof.Dr. Yılmaz stated that the National Struggle was carried out with the sacrifices of different segments of society and that one of the most important achievements of this struggle was the Republic. He stated that understanding the Republic requires knowing the past and passing this historical accumulation on to future generations.
The place of Anatolia in Turkish literature was evaluated
The other speaker of the panel, Prof. Dr. M. Onur Hasdedeoğlu addressed the development of Turkish literature and the place of Anatolia in literary works in his presentation titled "A Window to Anatolia."
Stating that literary and cultural life during the Ottoman period primarily developed around Istanbul and that Anatolia was represented in a limited manner in works for a long time, Hasdedeoğlu expressed that with the National Literature movement, the life of the Anatolian people, folk culture, the Turkish language, and the understanding of national identity began to become fundamental topics in literature.
Stating that the social changes experienced during the Balkan Wars, World War I, and the National Struggle years were also reflected in literature, Hasdedeoğlu noted that writers focused more on the social conditions of Anatolia and the lives of its people during this period.
Prof.Dr. Hasdedeoğlu cited Reşat Nuri Güntekin’s "Çalıkuşu," Halide Edib Adıvar’s "Ateşten Gömlek," Aka Gündüz’s "Dikmen Yıldızı," and Yakup Kadri Karaosmanoğlu’s "Yaban" as examples reflecting the visibility of Anatolia in literature and the social realities of the period. He stated that these works contributed to the understanding of Anatolia's cultural identity through themes such as education, rural life, the National Struggle, the relationship between the intellectuals and the public, and social change.